Today's Quote

I'm Reading

« January 2006 | Main | March 2006 »

February 27, 2006

How worried should we be?

I was totally confused by this week's Entertainment Weekly interview with Amy Sherman-Palladino, specifically by whether the network was talking about season 6 being the last one of "Gilmore Girls" or season 7.

Here's an excerpt from " 'Girl' Trouble?" by Ken Tucker:

The future of ''Gilmore Girls'' -- Will the critically adored series make the move to The CW?

Attention, Gilmore Girls fans wondering whether Lorelai and Luke will wed: There are bigger behind-the-scenes worries. While the cast is signed through next year, creator/writer/director/culture mistress extraordinaire Amy Sherman-Palladino has yet to renegotiate with The CW (that impending WB/UPN mash-up). The series is ''still doing strong numbers... and family neuroses really never end,'' she tells EW. ''Why make it the last year?''

EW: So who's saying it might be?

ASP: The studio is mentioning it [perhaps] being the last year.

EW: Are you signed through year 7?

ASP: No... as of April, I am apparently working at the Coffee Bean at the Beverly Center, making vanilla blendeds for girls going to Bebe.

So, my question is, when she says "Why make it the last year?'' does the "it" refer to year 6  (this year) or year 7 (next year)? I have the same question about her statement, "The studio is mentioning it [perhaps] being the last year." Which "it" is it?!

Adding to my anxiety is today's article on the L.A. Times Web site, which says:

Meanwhile, questions still swirl around the WB's "Gilmore Girls," which despite early reports might not be a slam-dunk for CW's fall schedule. Network and talent-agency sources say the CW still doesn't have a deal with creator Amy Sherman-Palladino or with cast members, including Lauren Graham.

It's true that the CW doesn't have a deal with Sherman-Palladino or her husband, but several publications reported late last year that Lauren Graham is signed on for season 7, along with Alexis Bledel and Scott Patterson (The L.A. Times has since corrected that portion of the story). But even this recent AP story is indefinite about the show's future.

Graham said the signs point to one more season after this one; the production company is making sure to add another year for people who had six-year contracts. Graham said that's when she'd like to move on, citing the show's workload.

"Getting the language perfect requires a number of takes that you might not have on another show," she explained. "It's just a lot of work 13, 14 hours door to door. I've missed weddings, I've missed babies being born. I'm not complaining, because of what it has brought me, but I would be ready for a different balance."

She has a hard time imagining the Palladinos not involved, particularly if the series is coming to an end.

Television economics may also play a part in the decision. The WB is canceling "7th Heaven" because, after a decade on the air, the network's most popular show was losing money because it was so expensive to make.

"They've come to us before and asked point-blank how long we think the show can go," Sherman-Palladino said, "and we say it's a family show, it can go on forever. If '7th Heaven' could have gone on for 10 years, why couldn't this show go for 10 years? There's no reason. They're going to be hard-pressed to assemble a cast this good on television again."

I'm not voting for a 10-year run, but please don't end the series with a cliffhanger in May! I'm not ready.

February 16, 2006

Now that's more like it

Here are some excerpts from a Chicago Tribune interview with Amy Sherman-Palladino and Dan Palladino in which they articulate what's happening with Luke and Lorelai and Rory and Logan.

Amy on whether the show will continue next season without her and her husband at the helm: "We have no say over how long this goes. It's all due to the network. They sort of decide year by year if they want another year. A couple times we thought [it was the last season], we thought Season 5 was the last year, but then we had this uptick, so, 'Oh, there's a Season 6'!

"We always put things in place [for the next season]; we've got a big, huge season cliffhanger finale this year, probably one of our biggest. Whatever happens next year, whether we're here or someone else is here, it leaves the show with really good momentum and lots of good places to go."

Amy on Lorelai and Luke: "We've got a lot of Luke-Lorelai stuff we're playing this year. A lot of ups and downs and twists and turns for them, in getting these kids to the altar. And we've also got Rory and Logan too, they're having a tumultuous year also. They’'e working their way back together. In ['Friday Night's Alright for Fighting'] Logan came through for her in a way she needed. He stepped it up a notch in that episode. That's their reconciliation. For now.

"We brought Luke's daughter in not so much to play 'Oh my God, there's a long lost daughter,' but more to play, 'Who are Luke and Lorelai to each other?' They're two mid-thirties people who have built very independent lives, needing no one, they've got their own homes, their own businesses; they've got things just the way they like them. They're incredibly independent and strong-willed and stubborn, and those are tough lives to mesh.

"The daughter thing was just a way to tap into an aspect of Luke that makes things interesting for the Luke-Lorelai relationship. Luke is very duty-bound and honor-bound and he feels great responsibility to family, even though family is something he scoffs at a lot. He's also a very single-minded, tunnel-vision person. So he's going to feel he's got to take care of this responsibility before he can take care of any other responsibility. Right or wrong, it's who he is.

"It’s a great device for us because [the daughter plot] taps into that without bringing in another woman or another romance, because nobody's going to believe that. These two people are meant for each other, the only think keeping them apart right now is their own baggage.

"And Lorelai, being an incredibly independent, proud person, she’s not a pusher. She's not going to say, 'But what about me?' It's sometimes their own lack of communication abilities that have kept them single this long, and that causes our conflict -- so we don't have to bring in the big elephant or the earthquake or 'We're trapped in an elevator' or someone's in a coma."

Dan on Luke and Lorelai and Rory and Logan: "We're really playing through the Lorelai and Luke thing, there will be something that will sort of put a cap on where we've been leading them. And Rory is dating a guy who -- Rory is a one-guy girl, very stable, and she's dating a guy who's not very stable. And that's always a part of their relationship. Now, they may get married at some point and live together for 50 years, but that instability is always going to be there, because they're different people who need each other for some reason. We're going to be playing out aspects of that friction over the next seven or eight episodes."

Amy on Logan and Rory: "There are deeper layers to Logan or she wouldn't be with him. Logan is a kid whose entire life has been preplanned for him. Rory grew up in a household where it was like, 'Anything you want, kid, you go for it.' He never had that. He grew up with all the money privilege, but he didn't grow up with any freedom. His freedoms are sort of self-imposed, 'I'm going to go act like an idiot, because I've never gotten a chance to explore who I am.' I think Rory sees something deeper in him. This is a very smart guy, and if he ever got his [stuff] together, who knows.

"There are also aspects of Christopher [in Logan], there's a little daddy issue there. Christopher was also a very rich, charming kid who had no focus. It's a little bit of daughter and mommy making similar choices. Who knows, years from now, if he gets his [stuff] together, I think they could be long-term. Right now, he's trying as far as he can try, but he has limits to who he is.

"And he's done some things for Rory that on the surface seem kind of bad, but I think in the end, are very good. Because Rory was very subdued and needed to tap into a strength in herself that maybe she wasn't doing so much, because she has a very strong mom and strong friends. She never really had to do that. She never really had to dig down deep and find out who she was. And this guy made her have to do that. So when you talk about it on that level, there could be more there [between Rory and Logan]." 

I find those explanations of the relationships very satisfying and encouraging.

Here's a possible schedule for the rest of this season's "Gilmore Girls":

6.16 -- Bridesmaids Revisited (Scheduled airdate, Feb. 28)
6.17 -- Rory visits Anna's store (Airdate To Be Determined)
6.18 -- The Real Paul Anka (Scheduled airdate, April 11)
6.19 (I'm guessing this will air the first Tuesday after sweeps begin, May 2)
6.20 (Guessing this will air May 9)
6.21 (Guessing this will air May 16)
6.22 (Guessing this will air May 23, last Tuesday of sweeps)

During this lull between episodes, I also read an alternate version of "A Vineyard Valentine" that felt emotionally plausible and interesting (although I'm glad it didn't happen). By the same fan fiction author, there's a really well-written piece that surprised me, and yet seemed entirely logical. Enjoy -- and tell the author if you like them.

February 13, 2006

A literary look at the "Gilmore Girls"

I've been fascinated by different perspectives on "Gilmore Girls," so I've been searching for and reading a variety of things, including a few pieces from Salon that are examples of how TV can be interpreted as meaningfully as literature:

Gilmore_script480I also discovered this package of stories about the show's 100th episode, including an interview with Amy Sherman-Palladino and Daniel Palladino, an article about Sherman-Palladino's style, a piece on the series' creative approach, its music, and finally conversations with the actors about how they are like and unlike the characters they play.

More recently, there was this Associated Press story about Lauren Graham's response to the Lorelai-Rory split. In it, show creator Amy Sherman-Palladino justifies the plot and also reveals a little about the end of season six: "The Palladinos are making plans for a cliffhanger ending to this season (wedding? no wedding?) and for the show to run without them in the fall, just in case."

I've also discovered a whole genre I never knew existed: fan fiction written about characters from TV shows, movies, and more. It's been fun reading some of the "Gilmore Girls" stories -- fictionalized accounts of what could have happened between episodes, between seasons, or (in one case) between the series stars in a novel-length story about Lauren Graham and Scott Patterson falling in love.

Here are some additional collections:

Also, from inside the serial box, Sarah Jessica Parker talks about the ill-fated "Sex and the City" movie: it would have included two weddings.

February 05, 2006

The Super Bowl of soaps

Although I grew up watching football with my dad, Gary and Colter and I are not really a Super Bowl family. But it's been a long weekend (Gary's been sick, Colter had a friend spend the entire day yesterday, my car died) and we were ready for a distraction -- especially in the form of entertaining commercials. So at 6 p.m. I headed to pick up the pizza and the peanuts and we were eating in front of the TV by kickoff.

During the halftime report, I realized: The way the commentators talk about football is the way I talk about "Gilmore Girls." They dissect every detail, replay the highlights, analyze every move, and predict what will happen next.

Sports and soap operas -- it's all about the drama. Who knew?

About


  • Mirrorsmall_2
    I'm Julie Moos. I live with my husband Gary and 11-year-old son Colter on Florida's Gulf Coast. I created DotMoms and work as an editor at The Poynter Institute, a school for journalists.

    Xml_2

DotMoms Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Parenting Headlines

    TV Guide Blogs

    I'm Watching

    Politics & Media Headlines

    Blog powered by TypePad