I love the English language. I love the dictionary. I love words. But there are some words I could do without.
If it were up to me, the dictionary would not include the word "should." There are too many shoulds in the world, too many choices we make because we feel obligated: "I should call my Uncle Q and apologize for yelling at him, even though I'm really, really angry that he borrowed my car then left it by the side of the road with the keys inside."
I asked my husband and son what words they would eliminate from our lives. My son Colter, who is 8, said he would get rid of the word "no."
He has no idea what a great idea that is.
What if people could only say "yes," "maybe," or "how"?
Wouldn't business meetings be different? Wouldn't conversations about curfew require more creativity? Wouldn't life just be better?
I would be so happy to live the rest of my life without ever hearing the word "no." It would eliminate, "No, we just sold the last one." And, "I wish we could, but my boss says no."
Maybe if there were fewer "no"s, there'd be more "I don't know"s.
If it were up to my husband, Gary, the dictionary would not include the word "due." Nevermore would the words "balance due" appear on a bill. He wouldn't have to worry about "due dates" or even "membership dues." For him, the freedom from deadlines and debt would be liberating beyond words.
After I finish eliminating words, I think I'd add some to the dictionary.
I'd like to add a word for that time of morning when the sky starts turning purple and you know dawn is on the horizon, but it's not quite there yet.
I'd like to add a word for the way I feel when I look at my sleeping son, curled up into a peaceful ball of boy, except for his leg thrown over my snoring husband so nocturnal escape is impossible.
And I'd like to insert a word for the dread I face on a rainy Saturday morning when I've just finished the last page of a fantastic novel and have nothing new to read.
Once I've added all the words I'd like, maybe I'd rearrange words in the dictionary.
Who needs alphabetical order? Making "A" the first word in the dictionary seems so generic and predictable. And why put the "Agricultural Adjustment Administration" hundreds of pages before the word "porcine" appears? Shouldn't they be closer together?
Why not reorganize so that the most important words come first? Love, kindness, consideration, respect. Speech, silence. Pen, pencil, book, school.
Then, the least important words could come last. The final word in the dictionary would no longer be zymurgy. In my dictionary, it would be hate.
Samuel Johnson said, "Dictionaries are like watches, the worst is better than none and the best cannot be expected to go quite true."
Perhaps then people might actually READ the dictionary and, along the way, learn to spell.
This LifeFiles column originally appeared on about 70 TV station websites managed by Internet Broadcasting Systems.