I'm a type A personality with a son who is happy to come in second.
What's strange is that I'm happy for him.
I don't mind that he played on a basketball team that lost all but one game last season. He really enjoyed and appreciated that single victory. He earned it.
I don't mind that he's not the most popular or the best dressed. He has several friends at school and wears clothes that are comfortable and affordable. I like that he's not label-conscious or overly concerned with what others think of him.
My son is a great student. He gets As and Bs, which means he's been on the honor roll every semester and is eligible to join the safety patrol or the school TV station when he's in fifth grade next year. He's also in the gifted program.
But he's not on the principal's list (straight As), and that's OK with both of us.
After a few years of piano lessons, he plays simple songs fluidly, but he's no prodigy. He started taking guitar because he enjoys it more.
This isn't about laziness or a lack of discipline or settling for mediocrity. It's about excelling where you can and enjoying everything else.
Don't get me wrong, Colter is competitive. He likes to beat his father at chess and checkers and any other board or card game he plays. He doesn't like to lose, but he knows that losing is part of the game, something I didn't come to terms with until I was in my ... well, I'm working on it.
I grew up feeling intense pressure to excel -- get good grades, get into a good college, get a good job, earn a good salary.
My life (and my parents' approval) seemed to depend on it. And I never felt I was achieving enough. Until I realized all the accomplishments were empty without the joy of work that mattered and the love of family and friends.
I didn't want my son to feel that same pressure, that same emptiness.
So he's getting a good education, but it's not the best money can buy. I know someone who drives two hours a day so that her children can go to a particular school. I won't do that.
Maybe this is selfish. My parents sacrificed so I could have the best of everything -- the best house in the best neighborhood, the best schools, every advantage. And I expected I would want and do no less for my child. But then he came along, and I saw things differently.
My son would rather spend time at home with me than spend hours being driven to a school farther away that might be better for him.
He was thrilled to be elected an alternate to student government. Last year he received only one vote for the same office. This year, he received more than any other boy in the class except the boy who won (a friend of his).
That's progress. And that's what he likes. He's all about improvement.
He says, "I just want to be good at the things I'm good at."
He's also smart enough to know that in life, we come in second a lot. Only one person wins, but many of us place.
What's best for him is not necessarily the best of everything.
He's my son and I love him. He's learning to love himself, win or lose. That's good enough for me. And I have to believe it will be good enough for him.
A version of this LifeFiles column originally appeared on about 70 TV station websites managed by Internet Broadcasting Systems.
It's called being content with what you have.
We live in an older house that needs some repair. Most of our furniture are someone else's castoffs (nice castoffs, but castoffs none the less). Tony's clothes are a mix of someone elses donations and the sale rack at Target. We don't have cable, Nintendo or X-box. Tony's shoes come from the local Payless Shoe Source, and I'm not paying thousands of dollars in tuition and gas to get him to some prep school. But we are content. And Happy. That's what matters.
Posted by: VJ | October 23, 2005 at 10:04 AM
YOu have taken the words right out of my mouth and my life this week. It is like looking at my life with my teen right now. I must say, I am so thrilled I am not alone. He is failing just about every subject and refuses to go to school....can I scream for help?!??
Posted by: Shelly | October 18, 2005 at 05:07 PM
That's why I come back here... I flip through my bookmarks and I think "Ah. She always has something thoughtful to say."
Posted by: Terry | October 13, 2005 at 06:05 PM
Years ago I had a column in a local parenting magazine and this was exactly the same subject of one of my articles. Yes, I'm the proud mother of average children. They won't win scholarships, athletic or academic. They're not driven to overachieve and I'm certainly not driving them there myself. (Not with the price of gas these days!) But they're happy and we're happy and everybody's safe and healthy and not stressing out. I applaud you for being one of us!
Posted by: Melanie Lynne Hauser | October 13, 2005 at 04:44 PM
I think I could have written the same post, except my girls aren't yet old enough for me to see how much their personalities may differ from mine and my husband's.
I do know that the "Alpha Mom" business is a large part of the reason I was so willing to leave New York. Just the anticipation of the suburban rat race was enough to exhaust me.
Posted by: Julie | October 12, 2005 at 04:36 PM
Excellent post! It's important, not only that we give our children the best that we can, but that the "best" doesn't have to be defined by what we had or didn't have as children ourselves.
My sister and I grew up broke, but raised with such love and compassion, that the fact that we didn't have what Joe & Mary Down-the-Street had wasn't a big deal. My mother raised us singlehandedly on a ridiculous salary with no support from my father. We learned that life's not always easy, but we learned that things worked for are better than things handed to you.
I thought that I wanted my children to have more than what I had - money, "stuff", activities galore, time with friends whenever they wanted. Well, they're growing up in a similar situation, only I have a wonderful husband helping out. I am glad that my children are learning that they don't have to have "all that" to be "all that." Make sense?
Posted by: Christina | October 12, 2005 at 04:31 PM
I sometimes worry that we don't make our son do more extracurricular activities. I know families who aren't home more than one or two evenings a week because they've got activities scheduled.
But then I remember that he's seven and just a kid. I want him to enjoy lying around, playing, reading. I want him to have the time to chase his two-year-old sister around the house with no intention other than to make her giggle.
I figure there's time enough to feel the pressure of life. Now, I know that he's not going to be the best at some things simply because we didn't insist he start them now. But maybe he'll have a good sense of self and of priorities. And maybe he'll be good at play, something I think more of us grown-ups should learn.
Posted by: Michele | October 12, 2005 at 11:28 AM
I usually like your columns and many hit home but this, this was something else! I think it's wonderful that your son has the self confidence that he is obviously exhibiting and BRAVO to you for recognizing what's important! I hope I am accomplishing the same with my son (he's six).
Posted by: Susan | October 12, 2005 at 08:52 AM