Circular arguments have always dumbfounded me with their innate stupidity.
When a circular argument contains a paradox it is just ridiculous.
Is he an alcoholic?
Denial is a symptom of alcoholism.
So if he denies the problem he must be an alcoholic.
This argument was used when I was in high school health class, and it can still be found in self help literature today.
Trial by ordeal take this one step further.
Is she a witch?
A witch will float, and an innocent person will sink.
So if she floats we stone her to death, if she sink, she drowns.
Either way she dies.
So I find myself cringing when my child SCREAMS "I'm not tired."
I'm not cringing because he is screaming, but because of the argument I'm about to use.
Is he tired?
I say "you must be tired, or you wouldn't be screaming it like that."
I know I'm right. But intuitively my son senses the circular argument.
He should just be glad that I don't apply the option of trial by ordeal.
Recent Comments